Bionic Legs Allow Paraplegics to Get Up and Walk

http://healthland.time.com/2010/10/11/bionic-legs-allow%C2%A0paraplegics-to-get-up-and-walk/

A robotic exoskeleton called eLEGS enables people who have been paralyzed below the waist to walk again. The technology, developed by Berkeley Bionics, is geared toward consumers — the 6 million Americans who are paralyzed, many of whom use wheelchairs.
For so many sufferers of paralysis — many of whom may have been active and athletic before an injury damaged their spinal cord — being able to move their bodies independently will no doubt be an emotional, gratifying experience. Watch for yourself:

"The most exciting possibility for the eLEGS for me is to take it out into the real world," said Amanda Boxtel, who was paralyzed from the waist down during a ski accident in 1993 and now works as a motivational speaker. "I'm not meant to be in my wheelchair, sitting down and rolling. I want to be tall in my body."

eLEGS is the latest in a line of "human augmentation robotics systems" that Berkeley Bionics has created with the Robotics and Human Engineering Laboratory at the University of California, Berkeley. It was based on another system called HULC, for the Human Universal Load Carrier, a robotics system licensed to Lockheed Martin that was made for the military to help soldiers carry heavy packs across extreme terrain without risking injury.

The eLEGS device consists of a backpack that holds the battery, and metal leg casings that are secured around a person's clothed body with velcro straps. A mixture of sensors and robotics creates a natural-seeming gait that can speed up to an excess of 2 miles per hour.  More from Berkeley Bionics:

The device is battery-powered and employs a gesture-based human-machine interface which — utilizing sensors — observes the gestures the user makes to determine their intentions and then acts accordingly. A real-time computer draws on sensors and input devices to orchestrate every aspect of a single stride.

Boxtel points out that the technology may be of help to those who are newly injured, since they may still retain muscle memory and their muscles will not have atrophy significantly yet. Such early assistance in getting patients back on their feet may further aid a host of minor health concerns associated with being in a wheelchair — from digestive issues to poor circulation.

Dr. Graham Creasey, chief of spinal chord injury service at the Palo Alto VA Medical Center, has great hopes for the eLEGS as well: "For the first time in history, we can start to think about giving movement back," he said.


POSTED BY: RENE G. GARCIA
THE GARCIA LAW FIRM, P.C.
212-725-1313 or 1-866-SCAFFOLD

Court Orders $3,900,00 Increase in Brain and Back Injury Case

On October 30, 2003, Jorge Angamarca was working as a carpenter on the roof of a residential townhouse in Brooklyn when he fell two stories through an improperly covered skylight hole. He was unconscious at the scene, remained in a coma for three months and was confined to the hospital for 45 days. Then he remained at a rehabilitation facility for 13 months before he started living in a group home for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) patients.

Mr. Angamarca was granted summary judgment under New York's Labor Law Section 240(1) for liability against the owner of the building and it contractors because he had not been provided with any safety equipment, as required by the statute.

The case went to a damages only trial because the parties involved could not agree on an appropriate settlement.  On April 8, 2009, the Kings County jury awarded plaintiff $20,000,000 broken down as follows:

• Past pain and suffering - $100,000 (6 years)
• Future pain and suffering - $1,000,000 (40 years)
• Past loss of earnings - $74,013 (6 years)
• Future loss of earnings - $573,131 (23 years)
• Past medical expenses - $1,531,172 (6 years)
• Future medical expenses - $16,721,684 (40 years)

The Plaintiff's Attorney alleged that the pain and siffering awards were unreasonably low and the Defendant's representative argued that the medical expense award was too high.
As a result, the Appellate Court ordered a $3,900,000 increase to the pain and suffering award.

• $100,000 to $1,500,000 for past pain and suffering
• $1,000,000 to $3,500,000 for future pain and suffering 

Injury details are as follows:

• Skull fractures including a temporal craniectomy, resection of lobes and placement of a cranioplasty
• Traumatic brain injury (TBI) leaving plaintiff with cognitive deficits affecting his speech, memory and emotions as well as left visual field neglect and spasticity of his left-sided extremities (arm and leg).
• Fractures of his spine at T7-8 requiring T6-9 anterior spinal fusion with structural humeral allograft, autograft and screw plate construct
• Displaced Colles fracture, right wrist (with malunion)
• Midshaft tibia and fibula fractures, right leg

 


POSTED BY: RENE G. GARCIA
The Garcia Law Firm, P.C. 
212-725-1313 or 1-866- SCAFFOLD